2021年考研英语一试题阅读理解Part A解析(石家庄新东方)

2021考研初试12月26~27日举行，2021考研初试环境(点击检察》》2021考研初试真题及谜底解析专题)，第一时候为考生供给考研真题谜底及谜底解析内容，同时考研考研西席将为考生供给视频直播解析。直播进口|考研真题谜底专区

Text 1

How can the train operators possibly justify yet another increase to railpassenger fares? It has become a grimly reliable annual ritual: every Januarythe cost of travelling by train rises, imposing a significant extra burden onthose who have no option but to use the rail network to get to work orotherwise. This year’s rise, an average of 2.7 per cent, may be a fraction lowerthan last year’s, but it is still well above the official Consumer Price Index(CPI) measure of inflation.

Successive governments have permitted such increases on the grounds thatthe cost of investing in and running the rail network should be borne by thosewho use it, rather than the general taxpayer. Why, the argument goes, should acar-driving pensioner from Lincolnshire have to subsidise the daily co妹妹ute of astockbroker from Surrey? Equally, there is a sense that the travails ofco妹妹uters in the South East, many of whom will face among the biggest rises,have received too much attention compared to those who must endure therelatively poor infrastructure of the Midlands and the North.

However, over the past 12 months, those co妹妹uters have also experiencedsome of the worst rail strikes in years. It is all very well train operatorstrumpeting the improvements they are making to the network, but passengersshould be able to expect a basic level of service for the substantial sums theyare now paying to travel. The responsibility for the latest wave of strikesrests on the unions. However, there is a strong case that those who have beenworst affected by industrial action should receive compensation for thedisruption they have suffered.

The Government has pledged to change the law to introduce a minimum servicerequirement so that, even when strikes occur, services can continue to operate.This should form part of a wider package of measures to address the long-runningproblems on Britain’s railways. Yes, more investment is needed, but passengerswill not be willing to pay more indefinitely if they must also endure cramped,unreliable services, punctuated by regular chaos when timetables are changed, orplanned maintenance is managed incompetently. The threat of nationalisation mayhave been seen off for now, but it will return with a vengeance if the justifiedanger of passengers is not addressed in short order.

21. The author holds that this year’s increase in rail passengers fares

A. will ease train operation’s burden.

B. has kept pace with inflation.

C. is a big surprise to co妹妹uters.

D. remains an unreasonable measure.

22. The stockbroker in 2 is used to stand for

A. car drivers

B. rail travellers

C. local investors

D. ordinary taxpayers

23. It is indicated in 3 that train operators

A. are offering compensations to co妹妹uters.

B. are trying to repair relations with the unions.

C. have failed to provide an adequate service.

D. have suffered huge losses owing to the strikes.

24. If unable to calm down passengers, the railways may have to face

A. the loss of investment.

B. the collapse of operations.

C. a reduction of revenue.

D. a change of ownership.

25. Which of the following would be the best title for the text?

A. Who Are to Blame for the Strikes?

B. Constant Complaining Doesn't Work

C. Can Nationalization Bring Hope?

D. Ever-rising Fares Aren't Sustainable

【谜底】DBCDD。

21. 【解题思绪】本题为细节题，经由过程题干关头词increase in rail passengers fares定位到原文首段末句Thisyear’s rise, an average of 2.7 per cent, may be a fraction lower than lastyear’s, but it is still well above the official Consumer Price Index (CPI)measure ofinflation.意为“本年的均匀涨幅为2.7%，可能比客岁低一小部门，但仍远高于官方的消费者物价指数(CPI)权衡的通货膨胀率。”D选项“ remainsan unreasonable measure.(仿照照旧是一个分歧理的办法)”表述一致。

【毛病选项阐发】

A. will ease train operation’s burden.(将减轻铁路运营的包袱)，与原文表述相反：imposing asignificant extra burden，意为“增长了包袱”

B. has kept pace with inflation.(与通胀连结同步)，原文明白暗示跨越了通货膨胀。

C. is a big surprise to co妹妹uters.(对通勤者来讲是一个很大的欣喜)，原文并未说起

22. 【解题思绪】本题为细节题，按照题干关头词stockbroker定位第二段Successive governments havepermitted such increases on the grounds that the cost of investing in andrunning the rail network should be borne by those who use it, rather than thegeneral taxpayer.意为“历届当局都容许这类加价，来由是投资和运营铁路网的本钱应由利用铁路网的人而不是一般纳税人承当”与B选项“railtravellers(铁路搭客)”表述一致。

【毛病选项阐发】

A. car drivers(私人车司机)，原文并未说起

C. local investors(本地投资商)，原文并未说起

D. ordinary taxpayers(平凡纳税人)，与原文表达相反，原文明白指出而不是纳税人

23. 【解题思绪】本题为揣度题，按照题干关头词train operators定位到原文第三段第二句It is all very well trainoperators trumpeting the improvements they are making to the network, butpassengers should be able to expect a basic level of service for the substantialsums they are now paying totravel.意为“火车运营商死力赞美他们对收集所做的改良，可是搭客应当可以或许指望他们如今为观光付出的大量用度可以或许供给根基的办事程度。”可知搭客并未得到办事，与选项C“have failed to provide an adequate service.(未能供给足够的办事)”表述一致。

【毛病选项阐发】

A. are offering compensations toco妹妹uters.(正在向通勤者供给抵偿)，原文说起抵偿的是受行业影响最深的人，并不是通勤者。

B. are trying to repair relations with the unions. (试图修复与工会的瓜葛)，原文并未说起。

D. have suffered huge losses owing to the strikes.(因为歇工蒙受了庞大丧失)，原文并未说起

24.【解题思绪】本题为细节题，按照题干关头词calm down passengers定位到末段尾句The threat ofnationalisation may have been seen off for now, but it will return with avengeance if the justified anger of passengers is not addressed in shortorder.意为“国有化的威逼可能临时已消散了，可是若是不实时解决搭客的公道愤慨，国有化威逼将会东山再起。”国有化，即扭转了所有权布局，与D选项“achange of ownership.(所有权的扭转)”表述一致。

【毛病选项阐发】

A. the loss of investment.(投资丧失)

B. the collapse of operations.(操作解体)

C. a reduction of revenue.(削减收入)

以上选项原文均未说起。

25.【解题思绪】本题为大旨题，本文属于很是典范的提出问题-解决问题的布局，问题很较着：即铁盘费用上涨，而以后论述其解决办法，即要低落代价，最少再也不上涨，与D选项“Ever-risingFares Aren't Sustainable(不竭上涨的用度不会长期)”表述一致。

【毛病选项阐发】

A. Who Are to Blame for the Strikes?(谁该为歇工卖力?

B. Constant Complaining Doesn't Work(延续埋怨不起感化)

C. Can Nationalization Bring Hope?(国籍可以带来但愿吗)

以上选项均只在文章中的细节中提到，属于以偏概全

Text 2

Last year marked the third year in a row of that Indonesia’s bleak rate ofdeforestation has slowed in pace. One reason for the turnaround may be thecountry’s antipoverty program.

In 2007, Indonesia started phasing in a program that gives money to itspoorest residents under certain conditions, such as requiring people to keepkids in school or get regular medical care. Called conditional cash transfers orCCTs, these social assistance programs are designed to reduce inequality andbreak the cycle of poverty. They’re already used in dozens of countriesworldwide. In Indonesia, the program has provided enough food and medicine tosubstantially reduce severe growth problems among children.

But CCT programs don’t generally consider effects on the environment. Infact, poverty alleviation and environmental protection are often viewed asconflicting goals, says Paul Ferraro, an economist at Johns HopkinsUniversity.

That’s because economic growth can be correlated with environmentaldegradation, while protecting the environment is sometimes correlated withgreater poverty. However, those correlations don’t prove cause and effect. Theonly previous study analyzing causality, based on an area in Mexico that hadinstituted CCTs, supported the traditional view. There, as people got moremoney, some of them may have more cleared land for cattle to raise for meat,Ferraro says.

Such programs do not have to negatively affect the environment, though.Ferraro wanted to see if Indonesia’s poverty-alleviation program was affectingdeforestation. Indonesia has the third-largest area of tropical forest in theworld and one of the highest deforestation rates.

Ferraro analyzed satellite data showing annual forest loss from 2008 to2012 — including during Indonesia’s phase — in of the antipoverty program — in7,468 forested villages across 15 provinces and multiple islands. The duoseparated the effects of the CCT program on forest loss from other factors, likeweather and macroeconomic changes, which were also affecting forest loss. Withthat, “we see that the program is associated with a 30 percent reduction indeforestation,” Ferraro says.

That’s likely because the rural poor are using the money as makeshiftinsurance policies against inclement weather, Ferraro says. Typically, if rainsare delayed, people may clear land to plant more rice to supplement theirharvests. With the CCTs, individuals instead can use the money to supplementtheir harvests.

Whether this research translates elsewhere is anybody’s guess. Ferrarosuggests the importance of growing rice and market access. And regardless oftransferability, the study shows that what’s good for people may also be goodfor the value of the avoided deforestation just for carbon dioxide emissionsalone is more than the program costs.

26. According to the first two paragraphs, CCT programs aim to

A. facilitate health care reform.

B. help poor families get better off.

C. improve local education systems.

D. lower deforestation rates.

27. The study based on an area in Mexico is cited to show that

A. cattle rearing has been a major means of livelihood for the poor.

B. CCT programs have helped preserve traditional lifestyles.

C. antipoverty efforts require the participation of local farmers.

D. economic growth tends to cause environmental degradation.

28. In his study about Indonesia, Ferraro intends to find out

A. its acceptance level of CCTs.

B. its annual rate of poverty alleviation.

C. the relation of CCTs to its forest loss.

D. the role of its forests in climate change.

29. According to Ferraro, the CCT program in Indonesia is most valuable inthat

A. it will benefit other Asian countries.

B. it will reduce regional inequality.

C. it can protect the environment.

D. it can boost grain production.

30. What is the text centered on?

A. The effects of a program.

B. The debates over a program.

C. The process of a study.

D. The transferability of a study.

【谜底】BDCCA

26.【解题思绪】本题为细节题，按照题干关头词CCT programs aim to定位到原文第二段第二句Called conditionalcash transfers or CCTs, these social assistance programs are designed to reduceinequality and break the cycle of poverty.意为“这些社会支援规划被称为有前提现金转移或CCT，旨在削减不服等征象并冲破贫苦轮回。”，与B选项“. help poor families getbetter off.(帮忙贫困家庭糊口富饶)”表述一致。

【毛病选项阐发】

A.促成医疗鼎新。原文并未说起

C.改良本地的教诲系统。原文并未说起

D.低落丛林砍伐率。原文中提到丛林砍伐率是成果，并不是目标，答非所问

27.【解题思绪】本题为例证题，按照题干关头词Mexico定位到原文第四句。按照例证题答题思绪，直接定位例子前的概念句That’s becauseeconomic growth can be correlated with environmental degradation, whileprotecting the environment is sometimes correlated with greater poverty.意为“那是由于经济增加可能与情况恶化相干，而庇护情况有时与更大的贫苦相干。”与D选项“economic growth tends to causeenvironmental degradation.(经济增加会致使情况退化)”表述一致。

【毛病选项阐发】

A.养牛一向是贫民的重要餬口手腕。餬口手腕并未说起

B. CCT规划帮忙保护了传统糊口方法。并未说起糊口方法

C.扶贫事情必要本地农夫的介入。并未说起相干信息

28.【解题思绪】本题为细节题，按照题干关头词Indonesia和Ferraro定位到原文第五段第二句Ferraro wanted to see ifIndonesia’s poverty-alleviation program was affectingdeforestation.意为“Ferraro想晓得印尼的扶贫项目是不是影响丛林砍伐。”与C选项“the relation of CCTs to itsforest loss.(CCT项目和丛林削减的瓜葛)”表述一致。

【毛病选项阐发】

A.它对CCT的接管水平。原文并未说起接管水平

B.其年度扶贫速率。原文并未呈现速率。

D.其丛林在天气变革中的感化。原文并未说起丛林感化

29.【解题思绪】本题为细节题，按照题干关头词most valuable定位到原文最后一段最后一句And regardless oftransferability, the study shows that what’s good for people may also be goodfor the value of the avoided deforestation just for carbon dioxide emissionsalone is more than the programcosts.意为“钻研表白，对人们带来的益处同时也给防止丛林砍伐带来益处，仅仅二氧化碳排放这方面，这个项目标意义就足够重大。”与C选项“ it canprotect the environment.(CCT项目可以庇护情况)”表述一致。

【毛病选项阐发】

A.它将使其他亚洲国度受益。原文并未说起亚洲其他国度受益

B.它将削减区域不服等。原文并未说起不服等

D.它可以促成谷物出产。原文并未说起促成这一信息

30.【解析】本题为大旨题，考覆按生对全文大意的掌控。经由过程全文内容可知作者在会商CCT项目对扶贫和情况庇护带来的影响，与选项A“The effectsof a program.(一个项目标影响)”表述一致。

【毛病选项阐发】

B.关于规划的争辩。原文只说起了这一规划的影响，争辩一词过于笼统

C.钻研进程。原文并未钻研其详细进程

D.钻研的可转移性。原文并未钻研其在其他地域的成长，以是不属于可转移性。

Text 3

As a historian who’s always searching for the text or the image that makesus re-evaluate the past, I’ve become preoccupied with looking for photographsthat show our Victorian ancestors smiling (what better way to shatter the imageof 19th-century prudery?). I’ve found quite a few, and — since I started postingthem on Twitter — they have been causing quite a stir. People have beensurprised to see evidence that Victorians had fun and could, and did, laugh.They are noting that the Victorians suddenly seem to become more human as thehundred-or-so years that separate us fade away through our co妹妹on experience oflaughter.

Of course, I need to concede that my collection of ‘Smiling Victorians’makes up only a tiny percentage of the vast catalogue of photographicportraiture created between 1840 and 1900, the majority of which show sittersposing miserably and stiffly in front of painted backdrops, or staring absentlyinto the middle distance. How do we explain this trend?

During the 1840s and 1850s, in the early days of photography, exposuretimes were notoriously long: the daguerreotype photographic method (producing animage on a silvered copper plate) could take several minutes to complete,resulting in blurred images as sitters shifted position or adjusted their limbs.The thought of holding a fixed grin as the camera performed its magical dutieswas too much to contemplate, and so a non-co妹妹ittal blank stare became thenorm.

But exposure times were much quicker by the 1880s, and the introduction ofthe Box Brownie and other portable cameras meant that, though slow by today’sdigital standards, the exposure was almost instantaneous. Spontaneous smileswere relatively easy to capture by the 1890s, so we must look elsewhere for anexplanation of why Victorians still hesitated to smile.

One explanation might be the loss of dignity displayed through a cheesygrin. “Nature gave us lips to conceal our teeth,” ran one popular Victoriansaying, alluding to the fact that before the birth of proper dentistry, mouthswere often in a shocking state of hygiene. A flashing set of healthy and clean,regular ‘pearly whites’ was a rare sight in Victorian society, the preserve ofthe super-rich (and even then, dental hygiene was not guaranteed).

A toothy grin (especially when there were gaps or blackened teeth) lackedclass: drunks, tramps, and music hall performers might gurn and grin with asmile as wide as Lewis Carroll’s gum-exposing Cheshire Cat, but it was not abecoming look for properly bred persons. Even Mark Twain, a man who enjoyed ahearty laugh, said that when it came to photographic portraits there could be“nothing more damning than a silly, foolish smile fixed forever”.

31. According to Paragraph 1, the author’s posts on Twitter

A. changed people’s impression of the Victorians.

B. highlighted social media’s role in Victorian studies.

C. re-evaluated the Victorians’ notion of public image.

D. illustrated the development of Victorian photography.

32. What does author say about the Victorian portraits he hascollected?

A. They are in popular use among historians.

B. They are rare among photographs of that age.

C. They mirror 19th-century social conventions.

D. They show effects of different exposure times.

33. What might have kept the Victorians from smiling for pictures in the1890s?

A. Their inherent social sensitiveness.

B. Their tension before the camera.

C. Their distrust of new inventions.

D. Their unhealthy dental condition.

34. Mark Twain is quoted to show that the disapproval of smiles in pictureswas

A. a deep-root belief.

B. a misguided attitude.

C. a controversial view.

D. a thought-provoking idea.

35. Which of the following questions does the text answer?

A. Why did most Victorians look stern in photographs?

B. Why did the Victorians start to view photographs?

C. What made photography develop slowly in the Victorian period?

D. How did smiling in photographs become a post-Victorian norm?

【参考谜底】ABDAA

31.【解题思绪】本题为细节题，按照题干关头词posts on Twitter定位至I started posting them on Twitter— they have been causing quite a stir. People have been surprised to seeevidence that Victorians had fun and could, and did,laugh.意为“我起头把这些照片公布到Twitter上并激发了很大的颤动”，以是作者的举动激发了大师的争辩，与A选项“扭转人们对维多利亚期间的印象”表述一致。

【毛病选项阐发】

B选项文中并未表现social media在钻研中的感化。

C选项notion of public image文中未说起。

D选项文中并未提到维多利亚时代照片的成长。

32.【解题思绪】本题为细节题，按照关头词定位portraits he has collected到第二段第一句Of course, I needto concede that my collection of ‘Smiling Victorians’ makes up only a tinypercentage of the vast catalogue of photographic portraiture created between1840 and 1900, the majority of which show sitters posing miserably and stifflyin front of painted backdrops, or staring absently into the middle distance.本句前半句意思是“作者的保藏仅占肖像照中的一小部门”，与B选项“他们在阿谁年月的照片中很罕有”表述一致。

【毛病选项阐发】

A选项文中并未说起其他historians。

C选项social convention并不是照片所反响的。

D选项呈现鄙人一段。

33.【解题思绪】本题为细节题，按照题干kept Victorians from smiling，定位第五段One explanation mightbe the loss of dignity displayed through a cheesy grin. “Nature gave us lips toconceal our teeth,” ran one popular Victorian maxim, alluding to the fact thatbefore the birth of proper dentistry, mouths were often in a shocking state ofhygiene. 意为“一种诠释多是通太低俗的笑脸表示出的庄严损失。维多利亚期间风行的一句格言是：“大天然让咱们的嘴唇袒护了牙齿”，这表示着如许的究竟，口腔凡是处于使人震动的卫生状况。”，与选项D“他们不康健的牙齿状态”表述一致。

【毛病选项阐发】

A.他们固有的社会敏感性。

B.他们在镜头前的严重情感。

C.他们对新发现的不信赖。

三个选项原文未说起

34.【解题思绪】本题为例证题，按照题干关头词portraits he has collected定位到例子地点句段Even Mark Twain,a man who enjoyed a hearty laugh, ....其所印证的概念在前一句，而且经由过程even可知本句与前一句为递进瓜葛:A toothygrin (especially when there were gaps or blackened gnashers) lacked class:drunks, tramps, prostitutes and buffoonish music hall performers might gurn andgrin with a smile as wide as Lewis Carroll’s gum-exposing Cheshire Cat, but itwas not a becoming look for properly bred persons.意为“露齿笑是地下阶级的表现，可是对付有教化的人来讲其实不符合”，可知露齿笑不面子是公家广泛的概念，与A选项“一个根深蒂固的信心”表述一致。

【毛病选项阐发】

B.毛病的立场。

C.有争议的见解。

D.发人深醒的设法。

例子的感化要末正向支撑概念，要末反向支撑概念，要末揭露布景信息，要末引出相干主题，以上三个选项都不属于此中之一。

35.【解题思绪】本题为大旨题，本文属于很是典范的提出问题-阐发缘由的布局，经由过程oneexplanation可窥见一斑，征象是维多利亚公众照片很少呈现笑脸，阐发缘由有二：①摄像技能后进;②牙齿状态堪忧。综上，A选项表述可以或许归纳综合全文内容。

Text 4

From the early days of broadband, advocates for consumers and web-basedcompanies worried that the cable and phone companies selling broadbandconnections had the power and incentive to favor affiliated websites over theirrivals. That’s why there has been such a strong demand for rules that wouldprevent broadband providers from picking winners and losers online, preservingthe freedom and innovation that have been the lifeblood of the internet.

Yet that demand has been almost impossible to fill—in part because ofpushback from broadband providers, anti-regulatory conservatives and the courts.A federal appeals court weighed in again Tuesday, but instead of providing abadly needed resolution, it only prolonged the fight. At issue before the U.S.Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit was the latest take of theFederal Co妹妹unications Co妹妹ission (FCC) on net neutrality, adopted on aparty-line vote in 2017. The Republican-penned order not only eliminated thestrict net neutrality rules the FCC had adopted when it had a Democraticmajority in 2015, but rejected the co妹妹ission’s authority to require broadbandproviders to do much of anything. The order also declared that state and localgovernments couldn’t regulate broadband providers either.

The co妹妹ission argued that other agencies would protect againstanti-competitive behavior, such as a broadband-providing conglomerate likeAT&T favoring its own video-streaming service at the expense of Netflix andApple TV. Yet the FCC also ended the investigations of broadband providers thatimposed data caps on their rivals’ streaming services but not their own.

On Tuesday, the appeals court unanimously upheld the 2017 orderderegulating broadband providers, citing a Supreme Court ruling from 2005 thatupheld a similarly deregulatory move. But Judge Patricia Millett rightly arguedin a concurring opinion that “the result is unhinged from the realities ofmodern broadband service,” and said Congress or the Supreme Court couldintervene to “avoid trapping Internet regulation in technologicalanachronism.”

In the meantime, the court threw out the FCC’s attempt to block all staterules on net neutrality, while preserving the co妹妹ission’s power to preemptindividual state laws that undermine its order. That means more battles like theone now going on between the Justice Department and California, which enacted atough net neutrality law in the wake of the FCC’s abdication.

The endless legal battles and back-and-forth at the FCC cry out forCongress to act. It needs to give the co妹妹ission explicit authority once and forall to bar broadband providers from meddling in the traffic on their network andto create clear rules protecting openness and innovation online.

36. There has long been concern that broadband provides would

A. bring web-based firms under control.

B. slow down the traffic on their network.

C. show partiality in treating clients.

D. intensify competition with their rivals.

37. Faced with the demand for net neutrality rules, the FCC

A. Sticks to an out-of-date order.

B. Takes an anti-regulatory stance.

C. Has issued a special resolution.

D. Has allowed the states to intervene.

38. What can be learned about AT&T from Paragraph 3?

A. It protects against unfair competition.

B. It engages in anti-competitive practices.

C. It is under the FCC’s investigation.

D. It is in pursuit of quality service.

39. Judge Patricia Millett argues that the appeals court’s decision

A. focuses on trivialities.

B. conveys an ambiguous message.

C. is at odds with its earlier rulings.

D. is out of touch with reality.

40. What does the author argue in the last paragraph?




A. Congress needs to take action to ensure net neutrality.

B. The FCC should be put under strict supervision.

C. Rules need to be set to diversify online services.

D. Broadband providers’ rights should be protected.

【参考谜底】CBBDA

36. 【解题思绪】本题为细节题，经由过程题干关头词concern定位到原文第一段第一句From the early days of broadband,advocates for consumers and web-based companies worried that the cable and phonecompanies selling broadband connections had the power and incentive to favoraffiliated websites over their rivals.意为“从宽带的初期起头，针对消费者和基于Web的公司的附和者就起头担忧，出售宽带毗连的电缆和德律风公司会具有壮大的动力和诱因来偏心从属网站而不是竞争敌手。”，与C选项“表白看待用户的左袒”表述一致。

【毛病选项阐发】

A.使基于收集的公司遭到节制。并未说起遭到节制

B.减慢其收集上的流量。并未说起任何信息

D.增强与竞争敌手的竞争。并未说起增强竞争

37.【解题思绪】本题为细节题，按照题干关头词net neutrality rules定位到原文第二段The Republican-pennedorder not only eliminated the strict net neutrality rules the FCC had adoptedwhen it had a Democratic majority in 2015, but rejected the co妹妹ission’sauthority to require broadband providers to do much of anything. The order alsodeclared that state and local governments couldn’t regulate broadband providerseither.两句话由also暗示并列瓜葛，意为“共和党下达的号令不但取缔了FCC在2015年得到民主党大都票时所采纳的严酷的收集中立法则，并且回绝了该委员会请求宽带供给商做任何事变的权利。该号令还颁布发表，州和处所当局也无律例范宽带供给商”，与选项B“采纳了反划定的态度”表述一致。

【毛病选项阐发】

A.对峙过期的定单。并未说起任何相干信息

C.已公布出格决定。原文提到相干信息前呈现了instead of，暗示否认

D.容许各州举行干涉干与。与原辞意思较着相反

37. 【解题思绪】本题为细节题，按照题干关头词AT&T定位文章第三段The co妹妹ission argued that otheragencies would protect against anti-competitive behavior, such as abroadband-providing conglomerate like AT&T favoring its own video-streamingservice at the expense of Netflix and Apple TV.意为“该委员会认为，其他机构将避免反竞争举动，比方AT&T之类的供给宽带的企业团体，以捐躯Netflix和AppleTV为价格，却偏心本身的视频流办事”，与B选项“它介入到了反竞争勾当中”表述一致。

【毛病选项阐发】

A.它可以避免不合法竞争。原文并未说起不合法竞争

C.它正在接管FCC的查询拜访。ATT其实不是遭到FCC的查询拜访

D.寻求优良办事。并未说起相干信息

39.【解题思绪】本题为细节题，经由过程题干关头词Judge Patricia Millett定位原文第四段第二句But Judge PatriciaMillett rightly argued in a concurring opinion that “the result is unhinged fromthe realities of modern broadband service,”意为“法官的定见是这个成果是离开现代宽带办事实际的。”与D选项“与实际没有接洽”意思表述一致。

【毛病选项阐发】

A.注意噜苏性。

B.转达了一个暗昧的信息。

C.与先前的裁定纷歧致。

三个选项原文均未说起

40.【解题思绪】本题为段落揣度题，可选择选项定位或段落大意解题。本题中可采纳前者，A选项关头词Congress，定位末段首句The endlesslegal battles and back-and-forth at the FCC cry out for Congress toact.意为“无尽头的法令斗争和对FCC的频频请求国会采纳举措”，与选项A“国会必要采纳举措来确保收集中立”意思表述一致。

【毛病选项阐发】

B. FCC应当遭到严酷的监视。按照FCC也定位第一句，可是严酷监视原文中并未说起

C.必要制定例则以使在线办事多样化。原文中并未说起任何相干信息

D.宽带供给商的权力应遭到庇护。按照broadband providers定位第二句，但原文中并未说起